<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d15853989\x26blogName\x3dparawars\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dTAN\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://parawars.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://parawars.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d5153403227673391985', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

parawars

thoughts, diary and photos of Team MAD

« Home | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next » | Next »

Geotagging with Flickr

Flickr launched geotagging yesterday. I have been using Zooomr (my page) recently has it has had this feature for a while, plus other cool ones... plus I have a Pro account there which means more photos and bandwidth than I can get for free with Flickr. But I find Flickr much better looking, for organisation and presentation of photos, plus it's a bigger site and has a larger community and way more photos. So now what do I do, pay the $25 per year for Flickr for a better 'experience' or stick with Zooomr for free?

More on Flickr geotagging on the FlickrBlog

[Blogged with Flock]

technorati tags:, ,

  1. Anonymous Anonymous | 29 August, 2006 18:00 |  

    Go Flickr... I dont like Zooomr :/

  2. Blogger Dan | 30 August, 2006 10:04 |  

    They had 1,234,384 photos geotagged in 24 hours....

leave a comment